You should check if there are medical clowns in your area. They have a whole praxis of drawing attention to themselves in order to defuse situations.
One time, when I was clowning jn an ER, a woman with her mother (patient) exclaimed to us "you wouldn't be laughing if you were wanting for so long!"
"oh, you're waiting for a doctor?"
"yes!"
"oh! what's his name well get him! and breath the shit out of him! "
"..."
"you don't know his name?!"
in which hilarity ensued. but the point is thst ou can hyper address things in a way that defuses things. and I think you'll enjoy hearing stories like this.
How do you determine if the parties are indeed acting in good faith? My assumption/observation is that the vast majority of online arguments do not consist of 2 people that are arguing in good faith
You should check if there are medical clowns in your area. They have a whole praxis of drawing attention to themselves in order to defuse situations.
One time, when I was clowning jn an ER, a woman with her mother (patient) exclaimed to us "you wouldn't be laughing if you were wanting for so long!"
"oh, you're waiting for a doctor?"
"yes!"
"oh! what's his name well get him! and breath the shit out of him! "
"..."
"you don't know his name?!"
in which hilarity ensued. but the point is thst ou can hyper address things in a way that defuses things. and I think you'll enjoy hearing stories like this.
Ooooh, THAT'S what the nose is about!
How do you determine if the parties are indeed acting in good faith? My assumption/observation is that the vast majority of online arguments do not consist of 2 people that are arguing in good faith
> All we need to do is rule out friendly fire.
Yup! Good example and write up!
have you seen The Rehearsal by Nathan Fielder?
if not, you should watch season 2. i think youd really enjoy an experiment he conducts (sorry, not trying to spoil it lol)
the point i was making ^^^ is that i feel parallels maybe between that and aoaio